Factors influencing dairy veterinarian necropsy practices and their use of diagnostic laboratories

Authors

  • Sierra F. Salopek College of Veterinary Medicine, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164
  • Danielle F. Nelson College of Veterinary Medicine, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164
  • Craig F. McConnel College of Veterinary Medicine, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164
  • Dale A. Moore College of Veterinary Medicine, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21423/bovine-vol51no2p140-152

Keywords:

cattle, dairy, necropsy, survey

Abstract

Dairy herd mortality rates have increased over the last 3 decades but dairy producers appear to be underutilizing veterinarians to perform postmortem examinations. The purpose of this project was to identify dairy veterinarian motivations and barriers for performing necropsies and use of diagnostic laboratories. A 33-question online survey was developed and a link sent to members of a dairy veterinary continuing education group in the western United States. Fifty-two veterinarians responded and many (70%) were offering 12 or more services to their dairy clients, including necropsy. Although 88% of dairy veterinarians surveyed considered necropsy to be a very to extremely useful tool, only 19% said all dairies within their practice utilized necropsy services. The producer's refusal of the service was the primary reason that discouraged practitioners from performing a necropsy (69%), followed by time (44%), cost (38%), and carcass disposal (27%). Factors most commonly reported to promote a necropsy were 'multiple animals affected' (85%) and 'unexplained death' (75%). Because identification of a cause of death could inform herd health management, these results indicate an opportunity to educate dairy producers on the value of necropsy services.

Downloads

Published

2017-06-01

How to Cite

Salopek, S. F., Nelson, D. F., McConnel, C. F., & Moore, D. A. (2017). Factors influencing dairy veterinarian necropsy practices and their use of diagnostic laboratories. The Bovine Practitioner, 51(2), 140–152. https://doi.org/10.21423/bovine-vol51no2p140-152

Issue

Section

Articles