MIC's for selected antimicrobials against Escherichia coli. Recovered from various animal species in Zimbabwe compared with isolates from Australia and the United States

Authors

  • George E. Burrows Department of Physiological Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma 74078
  • Andy Mauromoustakos Agricultural Statistics Laboratory, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701
  • S. Leon Burrows Department of Physiological Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma 74078
  • Eric Stair Department of Physiological Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma 74078
  • Jiri Tasler Department of Animal Health, University of Sydney, Camden 2570.NSW Australia 2006

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21423/bovine-vol1995no29p110-113

Keywords:

antibiotics, bacterial diseases, cefalotin, drug resistance, gentamicin, in vitro, kanamycin, oxytetracycline, penicillins, spectinomycin, sulfadimethoxine, sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim, aminoglycoside antibiotics, beta-lactam antibiotics, tetracyclines

Abstract

The MIC medians of ampicillin, cefalotin, gentamicin,kanamycin, oxytetracycline, penicillin G, spectinomycin, sulphachlorpyridazine, sulphadimethoxine and trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole combination were compared between locations using 2 non parametric tests, the Median and Kruskal-Wallis test. Typically, isolates from Zimbabwe were more sensitive to several of the antimicrobials than were isolates from Australia and the USA. There were few distinct or consistent differences between isolates from Australia and the USA.

Downloads

Published

1995-09-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

MIC’s for selected antimicrobials against Escherichia coli. Recovered from various animal species in Zimbabwe compared with isolates from Australia and the United States. (1995). The Bovine Practitioner, 1995(29), 110-113. https://doi.org/10.21423/bovine-vol1995no29p110-113