Case report

Two nutritional interventions in dairy cattle herds helped improve productivity and animal health while reducing the environmental footprint

Authors

  • Darren W. Remsburg School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, New Bolton Center, 382 West Street Rd, Kennett Square, PA 19348
  • Robert J. Munson School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, New Bolton Center, 382 West Street Rd, Kennett Square, PA 19348
  • R. Dean Elliot Troy Veterinary Clinic, RD 1, Box 163, Granville Summit, PA 16926
  • Linda D. Baker School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, New Bolton Center, 382 West Street Rd, Kennett Square, PA 19348
  • James D. Ferguson School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, New Bolton Center, 382 West Street Rd, Kennett Square, PA 19348
  • David T. Galligan School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, New Bolton Center, 382 West Street Rd, Kennett Square, PA 19348
  • Zhiguo Wu School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, New Bolton Center, 382 West Street Rd, Kennett Square, PA 19348
  • Charles F. Ramberg School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, New Bolton Center, 382 West Street Rd, Kennett Square, PA 19348
  • Zhengxia Dou School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, New Bolton Center, 382 West Street Rd, Kennett Square, PA 19348

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21423/bovine-vol44no2p131-137

Keywords:

bovine, dairy, nutrition, environment, environmental sustainability, veterinary service, animal health, case reports, cattle feeding, clinical aspects, costs, cows, dairy cattle, dairy cows, dairy farms, diagnosis, diets, environmental impact, excretion, factors of production, feed formulation, milk fat, milk fat yield, milk production, milk protein, milk protein yield, milk yield, nitrogen, nutrition physiology, phosphorus, productivity

Abstract

The Field Investigation group (FI) at the University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine was contacted for consulting services for two farms with economic and nutritional management concerns. Farm A was a 732-cow dairy referred by one of the authors (RDE) for concerns over ration cost and transition cow health. Farm B was a 98-cow dairy that contacted FI because of financial difficulties, specifically the high cost of the diets. In both cases, FI veterinarians evaluated and reformulated diets that resulted in positive economic, production, and environmental consequences. Farm A increased test-day milk, fat, and protein yield by 7.2, 0.03, and 0.07 lb (3.3, 0.014, and 0.032 kg)/cow/day after the diet reformulation. The ration also saved $0.45/cow/day while decreasing nitrogen and phosphorus excretion by 1.44 oz (40.9 g) and 0.11 oz (3.12 g)/cow/day, respectively. Farm B increased test-day milk, fat, and protein yield by 1.2, 0.11, and 0.04 lb (0.54, 0.05, and 0.018 kg)/cow/day after FI intervention. Ration cost was reduced by $1.09/cow/day, nitrogen excretion was reduced by 0.3 oz (8.5 g)/cow/day and phosphorus excretion was not changed.

Downloads

Published

2010-06-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Case report: Two nutritional interventions in dairy cattle herds helped improve productivity and animal health while reducing the environmental footprint. (2010). The Bovine Practitioner, 44(2), 131-137. https://doi.org/10.21423/bovine-vol44no2p131-137