Experimental and field usage of inactivated BVD or IBR-PI₃ BVD vaccine in feedlot cattle

Authors

John A. Schnackel Fort Dodge Laboratories, Fort Dodge, Iowa 50501

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21423/bovine-vol1984no19p33-36

Keywords:

Combined vaccines, Immunization, mucosal disease

Cover image of the 19th Volume of the Bovine Practitioner: a vintage photo of the Iowa State Capitol in Des Moines

Downloads

PDF

Published

1984-11-01

Issue

No. 19 (1984 November)

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Experimental and field usage of inactivated BVD or IBR-PI₃ BVD vaccine in feedlot cattle. (1984). The Bovine Practitioner, 1984(19), 33-36. https://doi.org/10.21423/bovine-vol1984no19p33-36

Download Citation

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Alicia D. Zimmerman, Robin E. Buterbaugh, John A. Schnackel, Christopher C. L. Chase, Efficacy of a modified-live virus vaccine administered to calves with maternal antibodies and challenged seven months later with a virulent bovine viral diarrhea type 2 virus , The Bovine Practitioner: Vol. 43, No. 1 (2009 Spring)
John A. Schnackel, Hana Van Campen, Alberto van Olphen, Modified-live bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) type 1a vaccine provides protection against fetal infection after challenge with either type 1b or type 2 BVDV , The Bovine Practitioner: Vol. 41, No. 1 (2007 Spring)
Lisa Jones, Hana Van Campen, Zhi-Chang Xu, John A. Schnackel, Comparison of neutralizing antibodies to type 1a, 1b and 2 bovine viral diarrhea virus from experimentally infected and vaccinated cattle , The Bovine Practitioner: Vol. 35, No. 2 (2001 June)